Global Trends/Sino-North Korean
ties
Can Xi Defang Kim Jong-un?
As China attempts to take on the mantle of a superpower, its ambitions
could be stymied by its belligerent neighbour whose nuclear tests are
threatening the US and other nations
Colonel R Hariharan |Courtesy: India Legal, 30 October 2017 www.indialegallive.com
On September 3, 2017, when President
Xi Jinping was holding a reception for dignitaries attending ninth BRICS summit
meeting in Xiamen, he got a rude shock. North Korea (Democratic Republic of
Korea –DPRK), under the leadership of irascible Kim Jon Un, carried out its sixth and largest nuclear test in defiance of
China’s strong opposition. This was not the first time it had happened; China
had strongly opposed North Korea’s nuclear testing ever since it started it in
2006. But after Kim Jong-un came to power in 2011, North Korea’s nuclear weapon
and missile development projects have made giant strides to enable him to test
both nuclear devices and inter-continental ballistic missiles.
China’s prompt response to North Korea’s nuclear tests since
2006 feature two operative phrases - “firmly opposition” to North Korea’s
conduct which was “flagrant and brazen violation of international
opinion”. That may not be sufficient any
more as China under President Xi aspires to become a super power in the
emerging international security environment. The rapid progress in North
Korea’s nuclear weapons and missile capabilities is a testimony to the dynamics
of change.
Though President Xi did not immediately respond to the September
3 blast, he was probably not amused.
CHANGE IN STANCE
After meeting with Russian president Vladimir Putin in Beijing,
Xi said that China was committed to the goal of North Korea giving up its nuclear
weapons. The statement is significant as it shows China’s recognition of the
need for international collective action to stop North Korea’s nuclear
capability. So it was not surprising China did not oppose to important sections
of operative paragraphs of the US draft resolution brought before the UN
Security Council passed in the wake of September 3 test.
This is a change from China’s stand when UNSC sanctions
resolutions on North Korea were passed in 2006 and 2013. The reasons for China’s opposition to North
Korea acquiring nuclear capability are strategic. North Korea acts as the
strategic vanguard to China not only North Asia, but also “China Seas” region,
where the US flexes its military muscle regularly. Nuclearisation of North
Korea would give the US an opportunity to introduce nuclear capable weapons in
South Korea, its strategic partner. This could thwart China’s desire to
neutralize the US domination of the region. Already, the North Korea’s repeated
missile testing has enabled the US to introduce American THAAD (Terminal High
Altitude Area Defense missile) anti-missile system in South Korea. To certain
extent, it cramps China’s missile operational capability. So China cannot
afford to provide the US and its allies further opportunity to enlarge their capability.
The North Korean nuclear test was undoubtedly a loss of face for
China and President Xi. The BRICS summit was part of his slew of global
initiatives to create a new world order as an alternative to the present US and
the Western domination of the world. President Xi’s other initiatives i.e., the
Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and the One Belt One Road also aim at increasing China’s strategic
reach and influence across Asia, Africa and Europe.
Peaceful development is central to Xi’s marketing pitch for all these
international initiatives.
After President Donald Trump has chosen to renege many of the
US’ international initiatives already undertaken, including the UN Paris
agreement on Climate Change, UNESCO, the Trans Pacific Pact (TPP) and probably
WTO as well, President Xi has shown his readiness to take on the leadership
role. For the success of these strategic initiatives China requires a peaceful
environment, which could be jeopardized by Kim Jong-un’s belligerence.
CONSOLIDATING POWER
Internally also, the North Korean nuclear test comes at an
inconvenient time for Xi. He had been working hard for the last four years to
consolidate power within the ruling hierarchy of the Communist Party of China
(CPC), the government and the PLA. His sustained anti-corruption drive has
enabled him to carry out a “house cleaning” drive to weed out potential
contenders to power from the CPC and the PLA.
Media reports indicate that the 19th Congress of the
CPC is also likely to anoint Xi as a mentor in the CPC constitution, a rare
honour bestowed so far only to Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping. Speculation is
also rife that the Congress might nominate him as Chairman of the CPC for life,
the first step to become a lifetime President. Under these circumstances, he cannot
afford to be seen as a weak and ineffective leader who cannot rein in North
Korea’s brazen conduct.
Ever since the North Korean strongman Kim Jong succeeded his
father Kim Jong Il in 2011 as supreme leader, he has relentlessly pursued his
ambition to acquire indigenous nuclear and missile capability. After the sixth
nuclear test, North Kora seems to have developed the capability to produce
hydrogen bombs. North Korea has steadily upgraded its missile capability; this
year alone it carried out 17 missile tests of varying ranges and capabilities. Two of the missile have been fired over
Japan. At least two of the missiles
tested can be classified as inter-continental missiles, capable of carrying a
nuclear warhead. This would indicate that North Korea was well on way to achieve
its overambitious goal of developing a missile capable of hitting the US.
RASH COMMENTS
Donald Trump, perhaps the most unpredictable U.S. President-ever,
and his DPRK counterpart have been bad-mouthing each other and exchanging
insults over social media. It was set off after Trump, in his inimitable style of
making rash statements, threatened to “totally destroy” North Korea, while
addressing the UN General Assembly last month. Kim equally
ebullient in motor-mouthing, took the name-calling to a new low, calling Trump
“a rogue and a gangster fond of playing with fire, rather than a politician.”
Kim concluded his statement with a promise to “surely and definitely tame the
mentally deranged US dotard with fire” and finally calling Trump “an old
person, especially one who has become weak or senile.”
Though the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov likened the
slanging match between the two leaders to kindergarten fighting, the dangers of
an unprecedented war exploding in and around Korean peninsula are more real now,
than ever before.
In a statement on October 7, Kim Jong-un said the nuclear
weapons were “powerful deterrent firmly safeguarding the peace and security in
the Korean peninsula and Northeast Asia in the face of protracted nuclear
threats of the US imperialists.” This is indicative of his insecure and
paranoid mindset. Given this background, North Korea’s repeated threats to
strike US bases in Guam and recent warnings to South Korea and Australia for
participating in military drills organized by the US cannot be taken lightly.
So it is not surprising
that not only South Korea, Japan and China, but the countries in the
neighbourhood such as Australia are worried of an outbreak of war in case Kim’s
goes berserk.
The North Korean nuke test represents a watershed moment in China’s
relations with its Korean ally, a relationship that has been cultivated during
the last five decades. In the heydays of their relationship, Mao Zedong
described it as “close as the lip and teeth.”
OLD TIES
The relationship cemented by the sacrifice of 180,000 Chinese
lives, who fought to save North Korea from being overrun by US and UN troops during
the Korean War in the past, had suffered periodic hiccups due to differences on
ideological, political and trade issues. In 1960s, Mao’s Cultural Revolution
caused serious ripples in the relations as Kim Il-sung considered it an
incorrect implementation of the principles of Marxism-Leninism.
The drift in China-North Korea relations had started when Deng
Xiaoping advocated political and economic pragmatism and opened China to the world. The Kim dynasty did not take to it lightly;
it has continued to rule North Korea with a hard fist, though there were brief
periods of honeymoon in relations with China. After Kim came to power, he ordered the
execution of his uncle Chang Song-thek, considered close to China, for plotting
a coup. Similarly, Kim is believed to be behind the murder of his brother Kim
Jong-nam, who was living in exile in Macau under Chinese protection. These
instances indicate Kim’s paranoia about China attempting a regime change. But
China may not want to do that as it could trigger an era of instability in the
country geographically too close for China’s comfort.
It seems there is no other option for both the US and China but
to set aside their strategic differences and come together to defang North
Korea. Is it possible? How will they do it without triggering a war? This is
perhaps a million dollar question for security pundits.
The writer is a
retired Military Intelligence specialist on South Asia, and is associated with
the Chennai Centre for China Studies and International Law and Strategic
Studies Institute.
2 comments:
A good assessment&an appreciation of the situation on the ground ,Bestcompliments are conveyed ,to add punch to the melodrama , Pakistan is playing truant with USA in
Afghanistan & on IRAN the rest of the world is not on same page as President Trump
Whether US Senate & Congress will accept Trump's aggression is doubtful. The
USpublic has suffered battle
Fatigue against future Military involvement anywhere , the US State dept
Pentagon & CIA also are not.on same page as public mood regards Prof KARGIL M Subramaniam (MSR)
I agree with you. Trump has churned up the order of things over a long period of time in Capitol Hill. But the Republicans know, Trump retains the support of the so-called Red necks - the unemployed working class and bible-thumping rural farming class in the Baptist belt. So in spite of all the grumbling they will think twice before precipitating a crisis to take on Trump directly.
Post a Comment