The latest scandal in the purchase of a dozen
August Westland helicopters, dubbed by TV talk show honchos as Bofors-2 the
vexing question why there are so many scams in our defence purchases? The
biggest reason is globally there is a lot of money in it. According to a 2009
estimate, the world spent annually $1.6 trillion - 2.6 percent of world GDP –
on things military including arms, equipment and services. A third of this
amount was probably spent on buying arms and munitions. And India is the
biggest buyer of them all; according to SIPRI statistics for the years 2007-11,
India with a ten percent share tops world’s top 20 importers. But that is no
consolation to the tax payer who is expected to pay 40 percent of this year’s budgeted
Rs 193,000 crores defence expenditure on imports.
The “Bofors 2” is not going to be the last
scandal in defence purchases because many more orders are in the pipeline. As
each scam pops up it reminds us that we have not shown competency to organize a
clean system to import weapons let alone create a world class arms
manufacturing industry in the country to reduce imports.
It is not that the Defence Ministry did not
think of such things. But apparently it is
in sync with the way we to do things in this country – complicate simple things
so that middlemen thrive on simplifying the complicated. MoD has evolved a complicated
12-step system for defence purchases. From conception to delivery each step has
built-in delay potential so that a little grease applied in right spots could
get bureaucratic wheel moving a little more easily. The purchase cycle usually
goes on too long; the minimum gestation period is probably four years and it
can go up to 12 years like the proverbial Gaja Prasav (elephant’s
pregnancy). The thumb rule seems to be the higher the cost, the longer it gestates;
it can go up to 12 years! After all even the much maligned VIP helicopter deal
had taken over seven years from thought to action.
At the first whiff of scandal, the risk of the whole
deal getting aborted at any stage is real. The MoD file cabinets of must be
full of tombstones of such deals. The defence minister AK Antony appears to be
in that post more to prevent corruption in defence purchases than getting the
armed forces to be battle ready. He has blacklisted over a dozen major arms
manufacturers across the globe. They include some of the best names in the
business with exclusive patents for state of the art weapons.
Somehow, no power broker – politician, the
shadowy middleman who should not be there, bureaucrat or service officer who
has the clout – appear to have been punished in many cases of corruption
investigated by CBI. Many cases are in limbo because it does not have somebody
to prod the reluctant CBI into action. Nor have they discouraged the flow of
kickbacks; more corruption cases are popping up in keeping with geometrical
increase in armed forces deficiencies. And the scams have grown bigger from Rs
62 crore kickbacks in Bofors deal to Rs 340 crores in Augusta Westland deal. Neither
the list of aborted deals nor the black list of manufacturers is likely to stop
growing if this scheme of things persists.
So what do the armed forces do? Run around in
circles like a cat chasing its own tail or start all over the process! What
other options they have? Write a letter to the Prime Minister? No, way; every
general will remember how the whole parliament jumped on the poor General VK
Singh for the sin of writing to the prime minister of his concern at
procurement delays affecting the battle readiness of troops.
So the obvious but unmentionable truth is if we
reduce our over dependence upon imported weapons opportunities for big
kickbacks would evaporate. So to prevent corruption that we evolve complicated
processes of arms purchase that have so many objectives - offsets for
indigenisation, power play through system of sanctions, resuscitation of ailing
public sector, political pressures, super power real politick, and but not the
objective of equipping forces in time.
Arms manufacture in India is mostly in the
hands of public sector firms, many of which have a monopoly in import the arms and
military equipment as well. Tatra truck scam is a very good example how they operate.
For years the public sector importer purchased vehicles of outdated technology
from the same agent at higher than manufacturer’s price and sold it at marked
up price to the army without any value. Army got inferior vehicles of dubious
quality at exorbitant prices while public sector importer went to the bank
laughing. And of course, the agent who was not supposed to be one went on
thriving in this happy arrangement for a dozen years.
Who got the kickbacks in the transaction? If we
go by past experience, the truth may never come out because scams come in waves
and wash away the old ones from public memory. Bofors scandal is a case in
point. Someone in the chain made Rs 64 crores in kickbacks; according to one
report the nation spent close to Rs 250 crores to investigate it and after 25
years the case is still open in a closed shelf of the CBI. In American slang calls
such results ‘zilch.’ I cannot find a better term to describe them.
These things never see the light because of the
blanket secrecy that shrouds all matters defence. It suits the black sheep
among politicians, businessmen, arms manufacturers, unscrupulous bureaucrats
and army officers and shadowy broker who is not supposed to exist. Scrutiny is
in-house and inbred. Dependence upon public sector to deliver has brought in
time delay as part of the whole process. And the nation and the armed forces are
paying for their sloth and inefficiency. They need not keep in touch with
global trends because another big establishment – the Defence Research and Development
Organization (DRDO) is supposed to do that.
If public sector manufacturers are holy cows, DRDO is a temple bull. Its
research is good in parts though much of it never gets translated into commercial
level production.
The systemic problems, the delays, corruption
at different levels stymie progress even if weapons are manufactured in
ordnance factories. Typical is the case of six firms blacklisted for ten years
in the case related to illegal gratification against former Director General of
Ordnance Factories Sudipto Ghosh. Rheinmetall Air Defence, Zurich was one of
the blacklisted firms. But General VK Singh in his hollowness in war-waging
capability list submitted to the defence minister points out how the project to
replace the barrels of T72 tanks with new 125 mm smooth bore barrels for 1800
tanks has been stalled because the supplier Rheinmetall has been blacklisted
for 10 years! It is surprising General VK Singh’s March 2012 ‘hollowness’
letter with a disturbing list of serious deficiencies has not been taken up in
parliament for serious discussion.
When a scam hits the roof or TV talk show, the
government freezes the transaction and orders a probe. After sometime media
jumps to another juicy bit and everyone forgets about it. The poor soldier at
the border carries on as before with out-dated weapons. Unless another Kargil
happens and the soldier is called upon to perform herculean tasks like a
veritable David fighting Goliath, the issue is forgotten. In parliament the
defence minister has spoken about taking up indigenous production to eliminate
import scams. These are brave words; indigenisation has been more in though
than action. In the last eight years he served as defence minister vested
interests in government have shown little enthusiasm to change the current
order of things. So it will be business
as usual I presume, when all the heat and fire generated by Westland scam dies
down.
Speed, scale and skill - Narendra Modi’s watch
words for development very much apply to nurture an arms industry. Let us throw
the defence manufacturing industry completely open to private sector as well. Let them compete with public sector; we cannot
afford to feed holy cows any longer. That may not clean up the system, but it
would make the cows and bulls run. Prices can be more competitive, products
state of the art and deliveries timely. And probably the government will make
more in tax revenue. But who will do it in the land of holy cows?
Courtesy: The Pioneer, Sunday, February 24, 2013 titled "Indefensible deals" http://www.dailypioneer.com/images/PDF/today_epaper.pdf
Courtesy: The Pioneer, Sunday, February 24, 2013 titled "Indefensible deals" http://www.dailypioneer.com/images/PDF/today_epaper.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment