Sunday, 2 February 2020

Sri Lanka Perspectives: January 2020

Col R Hariharan |31-1-2020| South Asia Security Trends, February 2020

Getting ready for the parliamentary poll

President Gotabaya Rajapaksa fresh from victory in the Rajapaksa battle for second coming, took a slew of decisions to fulfill what he promised in the run up to the November 2019 elections. The essence of his agenda was spelled out in his maiden speech in parliament on January 3, 2020. He rewarded the Sinhala Buddhist majority which voted him to power by saying what they wanted; he said “We must always respect the aspirations of the majority of the people. It is only then that the sovereignty of the people will be safeguarded. In accordance with our Constitution, I pledge that during my term of office, I will always defend the unitary status of our country, and protect and nurture the Buddha Sasana whilst safeguarding the rights of all citizens to practice a religion of their choice.”  

The above affirmation, coupled with his reference to the need for electoral reforms to ensure “stability of Parliament and the direct representation of the people” while “preserving the positive characteristics of the proportional representation system” while pleasing his Sinhala constituency must have filled the minority’s cup of woes. He has sent a clear signal that unitary form of government was non-negotiable. This strikes at the root of Tamil minority struggle for greater autonomy. 

They see the consolidation of Sinhala Buddhist votes under the new President voted in to find answers to their fear of resurgence of terrorism, not of the Tamil kind, but a far worse one with external Islamic State terrorist connections. Anti-Muslim paranoia was fanned by Buddhist fringe elements after Easter Sunday attacks last year by home grown Jihadi terrorists took 259 lives. It served Gotabaya to consolidate the Sinhala Buddhist votes in his favour though minority voters supported his opponent Sajith Premadasa.

President Gotabaya’s words of reassurance to the minorities and appeal to them to join hands in nation building did not sound credible with some of his actions and pronouncements.  His loud stand against devolution of powers to the Tamil minority and casual dismissal of the long standing issues of 23,000 missing persons and forced disappearances in the Eelam War showed his approach was ruthless and different from his brother Mahinda’s more politically nuanced actions. 

Though many may find Farhaan Wahab’s super-charged, angry narrative in the Colombo Telegraph on the rise of Sinhala nationalism alarmist, his comment “the majoritarian society that had been in a long search for a strong Sinhala man found its Dutugemunu over the demise of minorities political aspirations” would resonate with the fears of many minority leaders on the rise of Gotabaya Rajapaksa to the top. While physically ethnic divide may not be there in the island state, mentally it would firm further in when the country goes to elect its new parliament in December 2020.

President Gotabaya brings to his appointment skill sets and wide variety of applied experience never before seen in a Sri Lanka president. His impressive resume includes service as an army officer with combat experience, an expatriate in the US with experience as information technologist and most importantly, decade-long service as a bureaucrat who strategized the Eelam War to a total success.  His assets are his self-confidence, goal clarity, superior strategic skills and ability to leverage his knowledge of technology in problem solving and readiness to ruthlessly act to achieve his goals.  Many of his objectives like abolition of the 19th Amendment to the constitution to restore full powers to the executive president and reform of electoral system would require two thirds majority in parliament.

So we can expect him to focus on getting two thirds majority success for the SLPP-led coalition in the parliament election. To achieve this he will have to ensure he retains the Sinhala majority support and keep the opposition parties divided.

Even before the call of the parliament election is made, the leadership of the main opposition party United National Party (UNP) is divided over the question of coming to terms with President Gotabaya. The inner party power struggle between the old guard and the younger generation is debilitating not only the party’s strength but also dividing its coalition partners. The old guard is championing Ranil Wickremesinghe, seasoned leader to continue; it is also manoeuvring to keep out Sajith Premadasa from the leadership of the party. 

While Ranil’s followers want status quo, Sajith’s supporters want the party to change its style and increase its relevance to younger generation and rural masses. Sajith is also not forgetting to appeal to the Buddhist nationalist segment. The UNP leadership struggle is taking toll on its coalition which is divided.  That includes the support of minority political parties who have limited option but to support either of the faction. 

While the main opposition is trying to find its feet, President Gotabaya has undertaken structural changes in national security and intelligence. In his parliamentary speech he listed steps being taken to strengthen the national security apparatus. “Talented officers have been given appropriate responsibilities again. We have taken steps to ensure proper coordination between the Armed Forces and the Police, who are collectively responsible for maintaining national security. The network of national intelligence agencies has been reorganized and strengthened.” This would reassure the people shaken up by the administrative complacency that led to the Easter Sunday attacks.

But the President is not only trying to rectify national security aberrations but also contemplating structural measures that would eliminate bureaucratic blocks and administrative corruption that would ease common man’s life. It would not stop at offering freebies or tax cuts which he offered immediately after he was sworn in. President Gotabaya has spoken of creating central data bases to eliminate bureaucratic road blocks and corruption in public service, which had been the bane of Sri Lanka.

President Gotabaya is no go for minority voter because he has alienated them. Muslim political leaders, more than Tamil leaders, have a record of changing their coalition affiliations if due incentives are offered. This was demonstrated during President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s rule. After the anti-Muslim backlash of Easter Sunday blast, this is going to be a difficult exercise, which would probably be attempted after the parliamentary election.

Tamil minority is a different lot altogether. Perhaps, Sri Lanka president can usefully engage one of the India big data companies which advise Tamil Nadu political parties on how to turn his fortune with Tamil minority voter.

Col R Hariharan, a retired MI officer, served as the head of Intelligence of the Indian Peace Keeping Force in Sri Lanka from 1987 to 90. He is associated with the Chennai Centre for China Studies, South Asia Analysis Group and the International Law and Strategic Analysis. Email: haridirect@gmail.com Blog:: https://col.hariharan.info  


No comments: